Elon Musk , one of the flush people on the planet , mail a tweet Thursday night about the real job with ego - drive auto . And as you’re able to probably guess by now , it ’s one of those things that sounds heavy until you quit to think about it for three seconds . That ’s more or less Musk ’s stigma at this power point .
“ A major part of literal - public AI has to be solve to make unsupervised , generalized full self - driving work , as the intact road system is plan for biological neural profit with optical imagers , ” Musk wrote .
What does it mean that the system was plan for “ biological nervous net with optical imagers ? ” That ’s a fancy way of read that our current highway system was plan for human Einstein and human eyes .
Photo: Ringo H.W. Chiu (AP)
A major part of actual - world AI has to be solved to make unsupervised , generalized full self - drive study , as the integral road organisation is designed for biologic neural net profit with optic imagers
— Elon Musk ( @elonmusk)April 29 , 2021
Musk ’s sentiment is correct but perhaps painfully obvious in a way that makes it feel like the billionaire is play - acting as a human being . And the fundamental August 15 of the tweet is that 1 ) AI motorcar would be so much well-fixed without these vexatious human - centric conception and that 2 ) the trouble with AI in cars is n’t needfully the technology in the cars . The problem , as Musk require to hint , is the technology that ’s surrounding the motorcar , or the substructure that ’s allowed our entire elbow room of drive to take place over the past century .
Why is Musk squeeze something like this out into the world ? Perhaps because he needs to place incrimination elsewhere in the Wake Island of so many damning reports about his car society Tesla . Musk has receive far-flung critique for Tesla ’s packaging of a feature called AutoPilot , which is supposed to take into account semi - autonomous driving .
AutoPilot is n’t intended to allow amply self-directed drive , if you believe Tesla ’s lawyer , but you do n’t have to look too far to find masses testing the limits of AutoPilot . video have gone viral of hoi polloi riding in Teslas while no one is in thedriver ’s seat , as you ’ve almost certainly seen by now . But the great unwashed have died with AutoPilot engaged , with the most late example being two hoi polloi in Texas where the blast department had to call Tesla for advice because the flack burn for over four hours . Firefighters used over 30,000 gallons of urine to put out the glare , whichkept reignite because of the car ’s batteries . Tesla deny that no one was drive , despite what local authority say , but an investigation is afoot .
Ironically , what Musk is more or less argue in his latest tweet is antithetical to his actual talent . Musk is wide seen in pop acculturation as a visionary with skilful melodic theme and weak follow - through . His “ mass transit ” idea like the Hyperloop are a great example of that . In 2013 , Musk unveil his melodic theme for a fomite system in a vacuum electron tube that could travel at 600 mile per hour . And he shared that idea with the world hoping someone would make it . But it turns out the difficult matter about create a high - swiftness hatful transit system is n’t the technical school , it ’s the politics and the land rights , somethingI pointed out at the time , even before Musk formally announced his idea .
Musk would love to rip up the main road system and build something that was easier for his Tesla cars to describe and drive on safely . But that ’s not the problem that confronts him . That ’d be like robot manufacturers demanding that all new building only have one - floor and no steps because most human - style robots have difficulty wax up stairs . The old Darpa Robotics Challenge hadreal - world obstaclesfor a reasonableness . We want automaton to adjust to our human beings , we do n’t require to exchange our world to make the robots more easy . As diary keeper Kelsey Athertonput it , “ Tech interpret human as flawed and seeks to route around them . ”
But none of this is new . Darpa tried to make a completely self-governing car in the eighties but it hold gettingconfused by C. P. Snow on the roadat their trial run caterpillar tread outside of Denver . Darpa did n’t say , “ okay , well , we need to stop it from lead by the nose Colorado and then it will be perfect . ” They recognise that they had n’t cracked the puzzle yet .
The trouble , if Musk would like to proceed down this path of self-governing driving in the real humankind , is to make something for our current roads that his car can drive on safely . If he ’d like to ramp up a safe transportation scheme from he establish up , he shouldinvest in monorails . Or , better yet , he can dig a burrow and build something that would rightfully blow our idea .
Musk promise us the latter in home like Chicago and Las Vegas , but all we got was a Tesla with human drivers movingslowly in a burrow . When he ’s given endless possibilities with a newfangled terrain , he but fall back on previous habits . But it all seduce sense . Musk is fundamentally a businessman , not a visionary .
Daily Newsletter
Get the in force tech , skill , and refinement word in your inbox daily .
word from the time to come , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
